When I was working on a faith development analysis of Thomas Merton, I found two contrasting moments in Merton’s life that both occurred on Walnut Street in Louisville, Kentucky.
The first occurred after Merton completed his first visitation at the Trappist monastery, Gethsemane. on the Monday after Easter in 1941. He was headed back to New York, sad to be leaving the monastery where he had experienced intimations of what his monastic vocation might be like.
In his first volume of seven journals, he reports that he was feeling confused as he arrived in Louisville to await his train that would return him to New York. “There is a huge gap between the monastery and the world, and Louisville is a nice enough town but I wasn’t happy to be thrown back into it…. I couldn’t figure out, half the time, whether it was morning or afternoon. The sign “Clown Cigarettes” on, I think, Walnut Street, made me laugh wanly. I didn’t want to see any of the city, or any of the people.”. Merton reports that he fled to the Cathedral, then to the public library, until his train was to depart.
In powerful contrast, we overhear Merton’s reflection at the same place on Walnut Street, on March 18, 1958, some seventeen years having transpired for him in the crucible of the monastery, admitted for “monastic therapy as he would say. The power of this epiphanic revelation is dazzling to the reader of Merton, contained in the book, Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander, pp. 153-4. This recollection of experience and spiritual musing has been a touchstone for me for my forty years of wandering in my wilderness. I quote it here to punctuate my recent monastic swim across the River Jordan. I hope that you will find it enlightening, challenging, and mostly, a joyful moment of re-cognition.
“In Louisville, at the corner of Fourth and Walnut, in the center of the shopping district, I was suddenly overwhelmed with the realization that I loved all those people, that they were mine and I theirs, that we could not be alien to one another even though we were total strangers. It was like waking from a dream of separateness, of spurious self-isolation in a special world, the world of renunciation and supposed holiness.
The whole illusion of a separate holy existence is a dream. Not that I question the reality of my vocation, or of my monastic life: but the conception of “separation from the world” that we have in the monastery too easily presents itself as a complete illusion: the illusion that by making vows we become a different species of being, pseudo-angels, “spiritual men,” men of interior life, what have you.
Certainly these traditional values are very real, but their reality is not of an order outside everyday existence in a contingent world, nor does it entitle one to despise the secular: though “out of the world,” we are in the same world as everybody else, the world of the bomb, the world of race hatred, the world of technology, the world of mass media, big business, revolution, and all the rest. We take a different attitude to all these things, for we belong to God. Yet so does everybody else belong to God. We just happen to be conscious of it, and to make a profession out of this consciousness. But does that entitle us to consider ourselves different, or even
better, than others? The whole idea is preposterous.
This sense of liberation from an illusory difference was such a relief and such a joy to me that I almost laughed out loud. And I suppose my happiness could have taken form in the words: “Thank God, thank God that I am like other men, that I am only a man among others.” To think that for sixteen or seventeen years I have been taking seriously this pure illusion that is implicit in so much of our monastic thinking.
It is a glorious destiny to be a member of the human race, though it is a race dedicated to many absurdities and one which makes many terrible mistakes: yet, with all that, God Himself gloried in becoming a member of the human race. A member of the human race! To think that such a commonplace realization should suddenly seem like news that one holds the winning ticket in a cosmic sweepstakes.
I have the immense joy of being man, a member of a race in which God Himself became incarnate. As if the sorrows and stupidities of the human condition could overwhelm me, now that I realize what we all are. And if only everybody could realize this! But it cannot be explained. There is no way of telling people that they are all walking around shining like the sun.
This changes nothing in the sense and value of my solitude, for it is in fact the function of solitude to make one realize such things with a clarity that would be impossible to anyone completely immersed in the other cares, the other illusions, and all the automatisms of a tightly collective existence. My solitude, however, is not my own, for I see now how much it belongs to them — and that I have a responsibility for it in their regard, not just in my own. It is because I am one with them that I owe it to them to be alone, and when I am alone, they are not “they” but my own self. There are no strangers!
Then it was as if I suddenly saw the secret beauty of their hearts, the depths of their hearts where neither sin nor desire nor self-knowledge can reach, the core of their reality, the person that each one is in God’s eyes. If only they could all see themselves as they really are. If only we could see each other that way all the time. There would be no more war, no more hatred, no more cruelty, no more greed…I suppose the big problem would be that we would fall down and worship each other. But this cannot be seen, only believed and “understood” by a peculiar gift.” Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander” pp.153-4 (Note: Merton’s daily journal entry for March 19, 1958 contains a brief but similar reflection, Volume 3, pp.181-2)
The centering mantra that I placed in my soul for safekeeping was Merton’s spiritual revelatory exclamation: “Thank God that I am like other persons, that I am one among many.” I use it in almost every prayer session, with a deep sense of the freshness with which it occurred to Merton on that March morning. Liberated from the illusion of specialness, framed either positively or negatively. Healed from the narcissistic wound of isolation or elevation. It is a journey that continues, but is aided by other pilgrims who are making their way. Merton’s epiphany continues to stimulate my desire for both solitude and solidarity. Blessings.
Thank you for this one, David. . .
Wish I had read Merton a few decades ago before attending a reunion at my seminary when a couple of colleagues chided me for hanging out with — and caring about — my ‘SECULAR’ corporate clients. (Heavy accent on the word ‘secular’.) Found myself wondering if they had simply forgotten Luther’s ‘similar justus et peculator’, which makes it hard for me to decide who is on which side of the polarity. Seems to me we are all a bit of both.
LikeLike
Thank you David for this touching one,
As you can read in my ‘reply’ to John your blog took me back to my youth. I’ve even re-read your piece of art with Van Morisson’s ‘Hymns to the Silence’ on the background… extremely appropriate. We have all special memories from our younger days, and Van Morrison says it all in his own unique touching and poetic way. I must admit that I change the names on the streets of the Song ‘On Hyndford Street’… I replace Belfast streets using street names of my hometown. I do keep Radio Luxembourg, since I still can hear that peculiar static electric sound and that drives shivers down my spine, and of course I do keep Jack Kerouac…
You, as Van, are able to touch the Heart and Spirit of many people and certainly I am one of them.
Very grateful ‘brother from another mother’,
Johan
LikeLike
Thanks, Johan. You made my day. Going to cue up Van the Man straightway.
LikeLike